Legal Opinion

Hunt v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 12, 1897No. 230PublishedCited by 8 opinions

error to the circuit court of appeals for the' eighth circuit. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This was a writ of scire facias from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri against Millard C. Curtis, Robert H. Hunt and Hugh C. Ward, upon a forfeited recognizance in the sum of $3000, entered into by Curtis as principal and Hunt and Ward as sureties,, the condition of which was that Curtis should appear at the next term of that court to answer a charge of embezzling moneys of a national banking association, in violation of section 5209. of the Revised Statutes, and should abide the, judgment of the court, and not depart without its leave. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Respublica v. CobbetSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. United States v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Stearns v. BarrettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1816
  4. Respublica v. CobbetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1798

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hollister v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. United States v. Peter Calvin Jones, and W. R. Kenney, Professional BondsmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. Kirk v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1904
  5. Universal Transp. Co. v. National Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API