Hollister v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In "Error to the District Court oí the United States for the District of South Dakota.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This was a writ of scire facias issued by the District Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota against Frank Waugh, as principal, W. C. Hollister and Thomas Scanlan, as sureties, upon a forfeited recognizance for $1,000 given to secure Waugh’s appearance at the next term of that court to answer a criminal charge preferred against him, consisting of the larceny of two mares committed on the Rosebud Indian reservation. Waugh not being found, service of the writ was made against the sureties only, and they are now the only parties defendant.
The record…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Stephens v. Cherokee NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Matter of HeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Southern Surety Co. of Des Moines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- In Re Lawrence B. LockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. La PlantDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1911
- Kills Plenty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.