Legal Opinion
People ex rel. State Highway Commissioner v. Macomb County Drain Commissioner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1963No. Calendar Nos. 81, 82, Docket Nos. 49,950, 49,951PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The procedural nature of chapter 20 of the drain code of 1956 (CLS 1956, § 280.461 et seq. [Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 11.1461 et seq.]) was presented in comprehensive summary by Chief Justice Carr shortly after the chapter (formerly chapter 18A of PA 1923, No 316, as added by PA 1951, No 265) had been incorporated in the code. See Con*645nor v. Herrick, 349 Mich 201, 212, 213. A portion of that summary, quoted as follows, will introduce the ensuing opinion:
“Public hearing on the apportionment of the cost of the drain, or improvement thereof, is required to be held, with due notice by publication in a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Newport Mining Co. v. City of IronwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Brown v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Powers v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Petition of MacOmb Cty. Drain Com'rMichigan Supreme Court · 1963