Legal Opinion

Bracey v. Gray

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 1945No. Civ. 7171PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants have appealed from an order of the Superior Court of Butte County denying their motion to vacate and annul judgments entered against them in the above-entitled action on January 17, 1939, and on May 1, 1939, in a suit for possession of real property. The judgments were affirmed on appeal by this court. (Bracey v. Gray, 49 Cal.App.2d 274 [121 P.2d 770].) It is contended the decision of the appellate court is void because one of the members thereof was disqualified, under section 170a of the Code of Civil Procedure, from sitting as a member of that tribunal in reviewing the case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtiss Marine Turbine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Russell v. Crook County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bracey v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Kaufman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. People v. CastellanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Estate of LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Swan v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API