Legal Opinion

William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtiss Marine Turbine Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 26, 1913No. 1032PublishedCited by 32 opinions

PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the construction of § 120 of the Judicial Code prohibiting the judge passing on the cause in the first instance from sitting in the Circuit Court of Appeals, and the procedure of this court in regard to a case here on petition for certiorari in which such a condition exists, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

the court.

The Curtiss Marine Turbine Companies, the respondents, as the owners of several United States letters patent, sued the Cramp & Sons Ship and Engine Building Company, the petitioner, for infringement, because that company had contracted with the Navy Department to build certain torpedo boat destroyers to be propelled by turbine engines, which were to be constructed by the Cramp Company in accordance with specifications which, it was alleged, would cause the engines when built in accordance with the contract, to infringe the patents sued upon.

The Cramp Company questioned the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Nguyen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Balaji Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Harvey Hubbell, Inc. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API