Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. City of Decatur
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 5, 1959No. 8 Div. 984PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
Appellants, property owners and taxpayers in the City of Decatur, filed a bill in equity seeking a declaratory judgment and an injunction against appellees, City of Decatur and Housing Authority of the City of Decatur, enjoining the appellees from carrying out a redevelopment and urban renewal plan known and designated as the “Well Street Urban Renewal Project.”
Appellants contend that the redevelopment projects Act, Act 491, General Acts of Alabama, 1949, p. 713, and the urban renewal projects Act, Act 553, General Acts of Alabama 1955, p. 1210, which are listed as Tit. 25,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Zurn v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Martin v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Tutwiler Drug Co., Inc. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Gober v. StubbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Town of Gurley v. M & N Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.