Legal Opinion
Muto v. Kemper Reinsurance Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 9, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
189 N.J. Super. 417 (1983)
460 A.2d 199
RICHARD MUTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
KEMPER REINSURANCE CO. AND/OR PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. AND/OR LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 18, 1983.
Decided May 9, 1983.
Before Judges BISCHOFF and J.H. COLEMAN.
Donna M. Lombardi argued the cause for appellant (Borrus, Goldin & Foley, P.C., attorneys).
William M. Lake argued the cause for respondent Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
No one argued the cause for respondents Kemper Reinsurance Co. and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Hoglin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Purdy v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- DESIGN-4 v. Masen Mountainside Inn, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Contini v. Bd. of Educ. of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Ferolito v. Park Hill AssociationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Spring Creek Holding Company, Inc. v. Shinnihon USA Co., Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Shepherd v. Hunterdon Dev. Ctr.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- New Jersey Ass'n of School Administrators v. CerfNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.