State v. Pickett
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals from the decision of the trial court, entered on February 8, 2017, to sustain a motion to suppress filed by Defendant-appellee, Derrick T. Pickett. The State argues that the trial court erred by sustaining Pickett's motion based upon its determination that Pickett had been subjected to an unlawful investigatory stop. We find that the stop was not unlawful, and we therefore reverse.
I. Facts
{¶ 2} On November 15, 2016, at or shortly before 6:40 p.m., a citizen identifying himself as "Sean" called 911 to report gunfire at the intersection of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. GuysingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. HammerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. RutherfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.