Legal Opinion
Jones v. Shalala
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 23, 1993No. 93-15180PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
I. Overview
Plaintiffs are a class of Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) recipients. Each member of the class received nonrecurring (onetime) income during the first month of SSI eligibility. Under a policy established by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”), the amount of plaintiffs’ nonrecurring income in the first month was used to reduce the benefit payments in the first, second, and third months of SSI eligibility. Plaintiffs contend that this policy violates the Supplemental Security Income for Aged, Blind, and Disabled Act, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Juanita Newman, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kenneth Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Doyle v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Newman v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Jones v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jones v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.