Legal Opinion

Jones v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 1995No. 94-16865PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

This is the second appeal in this class action suit. In Jones v. Shalala (“Jones I”), 5 F.3d 447 (9th Cir.1993), we invalidated the formula used by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) for determining a Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) applicant’s monthly benefit payments in the first three months of eligibility. We considered the Secretary’s policy of looking to a one-time nonrecurring payment each class member had received during only the first month of eligibility and reducing the individual’s benefits by the full amount of such payment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Jones v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Mitchell v. United Health Centers of the San Joaquin ValleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API