Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Cullum

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1938No. 8342PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, District Judge.

Ford Motor Company sold to Dyke Cullum, its retail sales agent at Fort Worth, Tex., a'Lincoln automobile to be used as a demonstrator. The contract" of purchase was consummated at Detroit", Mich., where Cullum paid the purchase price, took delivery of the car, and personally drove it back to Texas. Mechanical defects developed in the car almost immediately, rendering it useless as a demonstrator, and substantially impairing its operating efficiency for ordinary use.

Ford Company, through its own agents at Dallas, several times attempted to remedy these defects, but…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. ManesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Ideal Heating Co. v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. E. F. Elmberg Co. v. Dunlap Hardware Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  2. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. Dobbs, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1987
  3. Alaska Pacific Salmon Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. HawheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Fairbanks v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API