Legal Opinion

Aller v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1925No. 24575PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

From a conviction of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape upon Marie Boyd, a 17-year-old girl, defendant prosecutes error.

The errors assigned may be grouped under three heads:(1) Insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict;(2) errors in the reception of evidence over objection; (3) error in the court’s instructions to the jury.

Defendant urges that the evidence is insufficient because of a lack of corroboration of the testimony of the prosecuting witness, Marie Boyd. The evidence of Miss Boyd, if true, shows that defendant assaulted her with intent to carnally know her,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hammond v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fager v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Dunn v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Dawson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Whetstone v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Frank v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Williams v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Onstott v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Svehla v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  5. O'DELL v. GoodsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API