Hammond v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
At the September, 1891, term of the district court of Lancaster county the plaintiff in error Charles F. Hammond was convicted of the crime of rape, as defined by section 11 of the Criminal Code, upon his daughter Alta Maud Hammond, and has brought the case into this court for review upon exceptions taken to certain rulings of the trial court. The first of the errors assigned is the overruling of a motion to dismiss, in the following language:
“State op Nebraska ] Y. > Defendant’s Motion. Charles F. Hammond. J
“Now comes the said Hammond, being first duly sworn upon his oath, says that he comes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strang v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Fager v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
- Whittaker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by29 opinions
- Harris v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. Den UylMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Cascio v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Onstott v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- State of Oregon v. RisenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.