Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fusaro v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 1978No. Appeal, No. 2094 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

George Fusaro and Richard Passarella, trading as Cynwyd Taxi Service (Appellants) appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission which suspended their certificate of public convenience. In July, August and September of 1976, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) filed and sent by registered mail, six separate complaints charging the Appellants with various violations of the Public Utility Law1 (Act) and PUC regulations in the conduct of their taxi business. Each of these complaints contained a notice that, if the complaint was not answered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. DERRY TP., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. National Automobile Corp. v. BarfodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Bridgewater Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Commonwealth v. DERRY TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fiore v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Phillips v. Commonwealth, State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. In re Return of the McKean County Tax Claim Bureau of the Tax Sale Held September 12, 1994Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Process Gas Consumers Group v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Schneider v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API