Legal Opinion
National Automobile Corp. v. Barfod
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 24, 1927No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
The Automobile Company Operators Association Act of May 10, 1921, P. L. 442, was intended to give the insurance commissioner power to regulate, supervise and control companies issuing contracts guaranteeing certain services to automobile owners, such as towing, legal aid, storage, repairs, gas, etc. It is not an insurance act, and this is admitted on all sides. Appellant is a corporation furnishing services within the terms of the act. Under section 10, in November, 1926, appellant was notified by Einar Barfod, insurance commissioner, that as the liabilities…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth v. CroninSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- People v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- White v. Old York Road Country ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.