Legal Opinion

Messerall v. Rubin

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1961No. Civ. No. 10115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNS, J. pro tem.*

Plaintiffs brought this action for damages and for the rescission of a contract to exchange certain real and personal property. Plaintiffs in their complaint alleged that they were induced by fraud and false representation on the part of the defendant Rubin to enter into and consummate an exchange of business and rental property owned by them in Ventura County for Rubin’s ranch and certain personal property situate in Siskiyou County.

Plaintiffs recovered judgment rescinding the contract and awarding them damages and costs. The defendant Rubin appeals.

The ranch, together…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Garrett v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Storage Services v. OosterbaanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Morris Stulsaft Foundation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API