Legal Opinion

Deaner v. O'Hara

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1906No. 5023; No. 2574 C. APublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Cotirt of Lake County. Hon. Frank W. Oivers, Judge. On Rehearing. Action by Hugh O’Hara and Helen O’Hara against William F. Deaner. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goddard

The appellant and appellees were- the owners of, and engaged in working, a mining lease known as the McAlister lease from June 28 until the latter part of September, A. D. 1900. The lease by its terms expired the first day of January, A. D. 1901. It covered that portion of the workings between the second and third levels of the Maid of Erin, Henriette and Adams mining claims, situate in Lake county, Colorado. It was worked at a loss up to September 18, 1900, when a settlement was had between the parties, and appellees paid to appellant their proportion of the balance of assessments then due.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McClure v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Newby v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  4. Drake v. Justice Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  5. Fanny Rawlings Mining Co. v. TribeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colorado & Utah Coal Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Clark v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Wilson v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Piggott v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API