Legal Opinion

Smith v. PULL-STAND. CAR MFG. CO.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

194 Pa. Superior Ct. 263 (1960)

Smith, Appellant,

v.

Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued November 14, 1960.

December 14, 1960.

Before RHODES, P.J., GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, ERVIN, WATKINS, and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Hymen Schlesinger, for appellant.

Richard A. Gray, Jr., with him P.K. Motheral, and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for appellee.

OPINION BY WRIGHT, J., December 14, 1960:

This is a workmen's compensation case in which the Referee and the Board found that claimant's present disability, if any, is not attributable to the accident alleged. Compensation was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Washko v. Ruckno, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Smith v. Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Erwin v. L. & H. CONSTRUCTION CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Lingle v. Lingle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Ferlazzo v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Magill v. Westinghouse Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API