Legal Opinion

United States v. Tocco

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 26, 1983No. 83 CR 650PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

On August 17, 1983, a special grand jury charged the twelve defendants in this case with illegal gambling, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1955, and 26 U.S.C. § 7203. Now before the Court is the government’s motion for an inquiry into any conflict of interests resulting from the representation of defendant Robert Wilson (“Wilson”) by attorney Victor Ciardelli (“Ciardelli”). For the reasons set forth below, we decide that Ciardelli will be disqualified from this case.

The government’s motion is based on Ciardelli’s past, and possibly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Dolan, John E.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Dr. Ing. Max Schloetter v. Railoc of Indiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States of America, Plaintif-Appellee v. Biagio Cirrincione and Tom CirrincioneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. United States v. David O'MalleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re Habeas Corpus Petition of HoangSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API