Sage Street Associates v. Northdale Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
Appellant (Sage) and appellee (North-dale) brought separate actions against each other under a construction contract. The two actions were consolidated. A jury found that Sage had wrongfully terminated Northdale, that Northdale did not breach its agreement with Sage, and that Federal Insurance Company, Northdale’s bonding agent, did not fail to perform its obligations under the performance bond. The court awarded Northdale $2,491,110 plus six percent prejudgment interest. The judgment is modified to reflect a ten percent prejudgment interest rate and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Perry Roofing Co. v. OlcottTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Winograd v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Tribble & Stephens Co. v. Consolidated Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
- Dankowski v. CremonaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sage Street Associates v. Northdale Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Atkinson Gas Co. v. Albrecht, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- European Crossroads' Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Criswell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- Henderson v. Central Power and Light Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- International Piping Systems, Ltd. v. M.M. White & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.