United Steelworkers of Americ. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.
These two cases present the following discrete issue: In an action brought pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. (‘WARN”), a statute which, like so many others, fails to explicitly provide a statute of limitations, should we follow the general rule and borrow a state statute of limitations or should we instead opt for the six-month statute of limitations set forth in section 10(b) of the federal National Labor Relations Act. The two cases present the identical issue for review…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., (In No. 93-2008). Charles A. Thomas Darren Boop Robert W. Bower William D. Bridge James Clingan Neal B. Housner Jonathan L. Noaker Wayne D. Orner Gerald W. Ranck Harold E. Van Sickle, Jr. Richard A. Winter Eugene L. Witmer, Sr., (In No. 93-7613) v. North Star Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994