Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Masters v. Tahash

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 23, 1963No. 39,129PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Relator is imprisoned under a conviction for the crime of forgery in the second degree. He attacks the validity of the judgment of conviction upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus issued by this court.

The record discloses that the judgment resulted from a plea of guilty. The charge against relator was made by an information identical in form to one described in State v. Briton, 265 Minn. 326, 121 N. W. (2d) 577, therein held demurrable or “fatally defective.” The substance and form of the information in question alleged that petitioner on August 5, 1960, “did…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. May v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. State v. EichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. State v. BritonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. In Re LatimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. State v. WurdemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Riendeau v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Boswell v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API