State v. Wurdemann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
The appeal is from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for judgment in his favor or, in the alternative, a new trial, after a verdict of guilty in criminal proceedings.
The information charged defendant with an attempt to induce a witness to withhold true testimony in violation of Minn. St. 613.09. The proof at trial established that defendant attempted to induce a young woman to absent herself completely and give no testimony whatever in an arson case in which it was then contemplated she would be called as a witness. At the time of the inducement…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- State v. BolsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- People v. . TealNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State v. MeanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WincklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- McCollum v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Cuypers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. OutkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.