Legal Opinion
Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corp. v. Ringside, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 4, 2013No. 12 Civ. 5297(PAE)PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Everlast World’s Boxing Headquarters Corporation (“Everlast”) brought this action against Ringside, Inc. (“Ringside”), Combat Brands, LLC (“Combat”), and RAL, LLC (“RAL”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants breached contracts with Everlast; infringed Everlast’s trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1), 1125(a), (c); and were unjustly enriched. Defendants now jointly move to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) or, in the alternative,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Randle v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Zaltz v. JDATEDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Malwarebytes Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Keybank Nat'l Ass'n v. Franklin Advisers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance, PLC v. Nippon Express USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.