Legal Opinion
Cruz v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 11, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Leona Freedman, J.), entered February 23, 1993, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for an extension of time to file a notice of claim and granted defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting the motion as to the infant plaintiff and denying defendants’ cross motion and, except as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff guardian’s derivative claim was properly dismissed as barred by the Statute of Limitations (Pierson v City of New…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cohen v. Pearl River Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bullard v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Welsh v. Berne-Knox-Westerlo Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- McMillan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Rosado v. Langsam Property Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Blackburn v. Three Village Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Jusino v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Strignano v. Jamaica HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1999