Legal Opinion
Steinle v. Beckwith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 1936No. 30,962PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Devaney, Chief Justice.
This case involves three actions for recovery of damages arising out of the same accident.
On Thursday, August 29, 1935, defendant, S. L. Beckwith who was a resident of Highland Park, Illinois, was in the city of Duluth, Minnesota. On the same day he left Duluth for the purpose of going fishing in the vicinity of Ely, Minnesota, planning to return on the folloAving Sunday or Monday. Before leaving he took his automobile to a gasolene filling station in Duluth," where he had been doing business for some months, and left it in the custody of the manager, one John…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Miller v. J. A. Tyrholm Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Atkins v. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Forrester v. JermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Schultz v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.