Legal Opinion

State v. Gandhi

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 23, 2010No. A-101 September Term 2008PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA

Stalking victims live in a nightmarish world of fear, never knowing when and where they are being watched, are being followed, or will be confronted by the unwelcome presence of their stalker. Victims often are forced to seek protection through the courts. The security that a stalking victim may derive from a judicial no-contact order is dependent, however, on the perpetrator’s incentive to comply with the order. Incentive is provided, in part, from the Legislature’s determination to make a stalker’s repeated violation of such orders an offense of the third degree, which carries the prospect…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. State v. EldersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. US Bank National Ass'n v. GuillaumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. State v. Kevin Gamble (071234)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. State v. Terrell Hubbard (073539)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Tahir Zaman v. Barbara Felton (072128)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. State v. MannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API