Legal Opinion
Hoffmaster v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1997No. D025961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, Acting P. J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the housing element in the City of San Diego’s (City) general plan substantially complies with Government Code 1 section 65583, subdivision (c)(1). This provision requires City to identify adequate sites it will make available as part of a plan designed to facilitate and encourage development of homeless emergency shelters and transitional housing. We conclude City’s amended housing element, which contains blanket developmental and separation restrictions on the siting of residential care facilities anywhere within…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Walter Camp v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Black Property Owners Assn. v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Buena Vista Gardens Apartments Ass'n v. City of San Diego Planning DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fonseca v. City of GilroyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- St. Vincent's School for Boys, Catholic Charities CYO v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Fleming v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998
- Opinion No. (2005), California Attorney General Reports2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.