Legal Opinion

Consaul v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1992No. D012162Published

1Opinion of the Court

6 Cal.App.4th 1781 (1992)

8 Cal. Rptr.2d 762

ROBERT CONSAUL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. D012162.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

June 1, 1992.

COUNSEL

Fischbeck & Oberndorfer and William L. Fischbeck for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

John W. Witt, City Attorney, C. Alan Sumption, Chief Deputy City Attorney, and Larry E. Renner, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

The issue presented in this appeal of the superior court's order denying a petition for writ of mandate…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API