Legal Opinion

Browne v. Franklin Fire Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an action in equity seeking to adjudge conflicting claims and distribute the proceeds of a certain fire insurance policy.

The facts show defendant, the Franklin Fire Insurance Company, is a corporation duly authorized to transact business in the State of Missouri, and John A. Hill defendant and appellant is a resident of Kansas City, Missouri. The plaintiffs, Salvatori (Sam) Agrusa and Anna Agrusa are husband and wife, and plaintiff, Allan R. 'Browne, is a practicing attorney of said city. On November 2, 1925, the Agrusas were owners of lot 13, block 5, Matthews & Hill’s addition in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. . the Brooklyn Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. McKee v. DowningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. GeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Stearns v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. United States v. Aid Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API