Legal Opinion

Stearns v. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 5, 1878PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

This is an action of contract to recover upon a policy of fire insurance on the plaintiff’s dwelling-house and furniture. It is brought in the name of the plaintiff by one Andrews, who claims to have an equitable lien upon the money due on the policy, to the extent of his interest as mortgagee of the real estate. This claim on the part of Andrews is founded on a clause in the condition of the mortgage from Stearns, the plaintiff, to him, which declares that if the mortgagor shall, until payment of the debt secured, keep the building, standing on the land, insured against fire for the benefit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Cromwell v. . the Brooklyn Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. James v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Ames v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Richardson v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  5. Lititz Mutual Ins. Co. v. MILLERMississippi Supreme Court · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API