Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 30, 2016No. Civil Action No. H-15-02414PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID HITTNER, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 9). Having considered the motion, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines that the motion should be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arises from a series of allegations made by prosecutors that allegedly identified and accused Plaintiff John Doe (“Doe”) in the criminal case United States v. Stanley.1 In Count Two of that case, *936Albert J. Stanley (“Stanley”) pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 371. Stanley was charged with a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hearn v. McCrawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Inclusive Louisiana v. St. James ParishDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
- McGowan v. Southern Methodist UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
- Mendoza v. DeJoyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024
- Patrick v. FuellingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.