Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 24, 1985PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’HARA, Judge.

This case presents the question, previously undecided in this State, whether the testimony of a witness who has undergone hypnosis to refresh her recollection is admissible in a criminal trial where the witness had no recollection of the events in question prior to hypnosis.

The defendant, Paul Edward Davis, was indicted for Assault in the First Degree, 11 Del.C. § 613, on June 11, 1984. The charge stems from an incident involving Bonnie Kay Hickman, the alleged victim and the proposed witness, on September 23, 1983, when Ms. Hickman (“the witness”) was found lying unconscious by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. TuttleUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Roark v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Burral v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API