McKallip's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
This is an appeal from a distribution made by the orphans’ court in the estate of Margaret McKallip, and raises a single question as to the proper parties to whom the trust fund provided by the will of testatrix should be awarded. By the original document referred to, three persons, Schoenberger, Grote and Barbara Bhodes were named in paragraph seven as trustees, and in number eleven the same individuals were selected as executors. By paragraph nine, power was given to “said executors and trustees, acting in either capacity,” to make sale of the real estate on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Potter v. CouchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Colt v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sigel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Schattenberg's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Mullanny v. NangleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- McKallip's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Sadler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Central Trust & Savings Co. v. Walters, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1932
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.