Schattenberg's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 157, Oct. T., 1920, by Edith Nonemacher, legatee, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1920, No. 213, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in estate of Frederick Schattenberg, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court in banc, in an opinion by Trimble, J., dismissed the exceptions. Edith Nonemacher, legatee, appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was decree, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
The question here is whether a legacy given in a codicil is subject to the trust created by the will. In 1906, Frederick Schattenberg made his last will, which embraced, inter alia, a devise of certain real estate to his daughter, Eda [Edith] Nonemacher, and in clause eighth provided, “The rest and residue of my estate shall go to my trustee herein appointed and by it invested (not how*92ever so as to interfere with Article Seventh) and the net income to be paid to my daughter Eda Nonemacher in her own hand — nor shall it be liable for any process for the collection…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sigel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Appeal of ReichardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Morrow's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Frechie's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Jones v. Strong, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1891
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wright's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Warne's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Boyer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Crooks EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Dutton's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.