Legal Opinion
Sheffield v. Orius Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 8, 2002No. CIV. 02-CV-749-ASPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.
On July 19, 2002, plaintiffs moved to certify a collective action under § 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). See 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). On September 13, 2002, Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas filed his Findings and Recommendation that plaintiffs’ motion to certify a collective action should be denied. The matter is now before the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). A decision to certify a class is considered a “dispositive motion” for purposes of Rule 72. See Cornilles v. Regal Cinemas, Inc., 2000 WL 1364236…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Gauvin v. TrombatoreDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Scholtisek v. Eldre Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- McKnight v. D. Houston, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Harrison v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.