New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Gray
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, STATE OF NEW YORK. . The facts, which involve the construction of the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act as amended in 1906, prohibiting discrimination in regard to facilities and privileges of transportation and the validity of contracts made prior to the Hepburn Amendment and the rights of parties thereunder, are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, STATE OF NEW YORK. . The facts, which involve the construction of the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act as amended in 1906, prohibiting discrimination in regard to facilities and privileges of transportation and the validity of contracts made prior to the Hepburn Amendment and the rights of parties thereunder, are stated in the opinion. The transportation which plaintiff in error agreed to furnish defendant in error was to be used on interstate journeys and was, therefore, subject to the provisions of the Act of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
In the month of November, 1900, Charles P. Gray, the defendant in error, made an agreement with the representatives of the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company, plaintiff in error, to make for the company a large map of'the Vanderbilt Lines for the World’s Fair, which was to take place at Buffalo in the following year. The price agreed to be paid him was $750, of which $150 was to be paid in cash and the balance in transportation to be used by defendant in error in traveling between New York City and his farm in Girard, Pa., following the lines of plaintiff in error between New…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Railroad Comm'n of Ohio v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Winton v. AmosSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.