Legal Opinion

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1911No. 74PublishedCited by 38 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. The facts, which involve the. construction of provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act relating to payment of fare on railways, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. The facts, which involve the. construction of provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act relating to payment of fare on railways, are stated in the opinion. It is claimed that the publisher could hand over $500 in money for transportation which could be handed back for advertising without violating the law, and that it is absurd to forbid the parties from doing directly what they could undoubtedly do indirectly. The obvious answer is, however, such a transaction would be a mere barter of transportation…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hablan

By the act of Congress of February 19, 1903, further regulating commerce with foreign nations and among the States, as amended by the act of June 29, 1906, it was provided that whenever the Interstate Commerce Comrnission had reasonable ground to believe that a common carrier was engaged in carrying passengers or freight between given points at less than the published rates on file or was committing any discrimination forbidden by law, the facts could be set forth in a petition in equity to the proper Circuit Court of the United States, whose duty it was made summarily to inquire into the.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Sinnot v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1859

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. LindellSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Culver v. City of WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Hocking Valley Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API