Legal Opinion

World Mart, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 7, 1973No. C.D. 4490; Court Nos. R65/4341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.Newman, Judge:

Defendant’s motion for a more definite statement covering these 26 appeals for reappraisement will be denied without prejudice to a reconsideration thereof.1 In summary, plaintiff’s attorney of record has not been served with a copy of defendant’s motion, and. thus has had no opportunity to respond to the motion.

The complaints were signed in the following manner:

Cassel and Benjamin and Brian R. Hersh

By '_(Signature)_

Brian R. Hersh, Attorneys for Plaintiff

602 Biscayne Building, 19 W. Flagler St.

Miami, Florida 33130, Tel: 379-1641

The certificate of service attached to defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. S. Stern & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. S. Stern, Henry & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. R. G. Hobelmann & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. World Mart, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Philip J. Bernstein Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Cury v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API