Legal Opinion

Cury v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 15, 1980No. C.R.D. 80-12; Protest Nos. 1001-0-000678Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

It appears from the papers filed in this matter that Mr. B. G. Cury, chairman and sole stockholder of Curly Top, Inc., advised the clerk of this court by letter dated July 24, 1980, that he *121desired to bring an action in this court without the benefit of counsel. On July 29, 1980, Mr. Cury was advised by the chief deputy clerk of this court that the summonses were being returned since they welre not in conformity with rule 3.2(a), which provides for a filing fee to be paid when the action is commenced. In addition, Mr. Cury was advised that rule 3.2(c) requires that, except in an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Research Automation Corporation, Konstantinos M. TserpesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. 9.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Marquette County, Michigan, Beico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Simbraw, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  5. Highley v. RothmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API