Legal Opinion

Philip J. Bernstein Enterprises v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 7, 1973No. C.R.D. 73-34; Court Nos. R64/24334PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

Defendant’s motion for a more definite statement covering these six appeals for reappraisement will be denied without prejudice to a reconsideration thereof. Plaintiff’s attorney of record has not been served with a copy of defendant’s motion, and thus has had no opportunity to respond to the motion.

The complaints were signed in the following manner:

Cassel and Benjamin and Brian R. Hersh By_(Signature)_

Brian R. Hersh, Attorneys for Plaintiff

602 Biscayne Building, 19 W. Flagler St.

Miami, Florida 33130, Tel: 379-1641

The certificate of service attached to defendant’s motion recites…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. World Mart, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. World Mart, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Philip J. Bernstein Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API