Legal Opinion
Man-Sew Pinking Attachment Corp. v. Chandler MacH. Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 21, 1940No. 164PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLELLAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a manufacturer of pinking machines, alleges that the defendants, who are respectively a competitor and two of its officers, are threatening the plaintiff and its customers with suits for infringement of certain patents, and seeks a declaratory judgment to the effect that these patents, U. S. No. 1,984,224 and U. S. Design No. 112,121, are invalid for various reasons, and are not infringed by the plaintiff. Unfair competition is also alleged as a basis for relief. In their answer, the defendants set up a counterclaim, admitting that the patents in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kirsch Mfg. Co. v. Gould Mersereau Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lucien Lelong, Inc. v. Dana Perfumes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
- Unistrut Corporation v. PowerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
- Western Electric Co. v. HammondDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942