Legal Opinion
Cacace v. Meyer Marketing (Macau Commercial Offshore) Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 13, 2011No. Case No. 06-CV-2938 (KMK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Chris Cacace (“Cacace”) and Culinary Edge Creations, LLC (“CEC”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this patent infringement action against Defendants Meyer Corporation, U.S. (“Meyer U.S.”) and its affiliate, Meyer Marketing (Macau Commercial Offshore) Co., Ltd. (“Meyer Macau”) (collectively, “Meyer” or “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants have infringed a patent over which Cacace claims ownership and over which CEC claims exploitation rights. The Parties have sought an opinion from the Court to construct the meaning of several…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Team Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014