Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Team Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 15, 2014No. Case No. 1:12-cv-552PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INDEFINITENESS (Doc. 91)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Doc. 91) and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 97, 104,114,127, and 128).
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants are infringing three patents: U.S. Patent No. 5,891,453 (“the '453 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 5,894,017 (“the '017 Patent”), and U.S. *766Patent No. 7,122,199 (“the '199 Patent”), which concern home tooth whitening products. This civil action was originally…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Advanced Aerospace Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- 3M Innovative Properties Co. v. GDC, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Abboud v. TravelersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Axion Biosystems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2026