Legal Opinion
Zimmerman v. Puccio
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 27, 2010No. 09-1416PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellants John and Richard Puccio appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the plaintiffs, Andrew and Kelly Zimmerman, on behalf of a class of clients of Cambridge Credit Counseling Corporation (“Cambridge”), one of the Puccios’ business enterprises, pursuant to the Credit Repair Organizations Act (“CROA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1679-1679j. CROA was enacted by Congress in 1996 to protect the public from unfair or deceptive advertising and business practices by credit repair organizations.
Although the district court entered summary judgment against the Puccios…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Chiang v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Federal Trade Commission v. Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Breda v. Cellco PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Taylor v. BettisDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Robb Evans & Associates, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.