Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Jordan Marsh Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1933PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for injuries resulting to the plaintiff from being bitten by a dog while she was in the defendant’s department store. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict and to parts of the charge.

There was evidence that the plaintiff on January 12, 1927, was bitten by a dog when she as a customer of the defendant was in the basement of the “annex” to the store, a part of the store intended for the use of customers. It is agreed that the dog had rabies and that the plaintiff required…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Blair v. ForehandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Ogden v. AspinwallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Goodwin v. E. B. Nelson Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Le Forest v. TolmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Luz v. Stop & Shop, Inc. of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Royer v. Pryor Ex Rel. PryorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Siegel v. 1536-46 St. John's Place Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1945
  5. Milasevich v. Fox Western Montana Theatre Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1946

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API