Homebuilders Ass'n of Charlotte, Inc. v. City of Charlotte
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred by granting declaratory judgment in favor of the City of Charlotte. We agree and reverse.
I
Initially, we note that both parties stipulated that the trial court had jurisdiction over this matter. A municipality may have its rights and obligations determined in a declaratory judgment *332action. Board of Managers v. Wilmington, 237 N.C. 179, 74 S.E.2d 749 (1953).
II
Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred “because the City did not have the authority to impose ‘user fees’ for mandated regulatory services.” We agree.
“A municipality has only…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Smith v. KeatorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Homebuilders Ass'n of Charlotte, Inc. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Homebuilders Ass'n of Charlotte, Inc. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994