Legal Opinion

Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Union Planters Natl. Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 28, 1960No. 5-2004PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an eminent domain proceeding by which the State Highway Commission seeks to condemn the necessary property rights to enable it to convert an existing highway across the appellees’ farm lands into a controlled-access facility. See Act 383 of 1953; Ark. Stats. 1947, Title 76, Ch. 22. In asking the jury for an award of substantial damages the landowners relied mainly upon the fact that their plantation will be effectively cut in two, lengthwise, by the new thoroughfare, since they will be prohibited from crossing it at any point along its three-mile passage over their property. The jury…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Warren v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Anhoco Corporation v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  3. American Physicians Insurance Co. v. HruskaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Ellis v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Moulton v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API