Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Industrial Finance Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 10, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
These are motions (1) by the defendant Industrial Acceptance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “IAC”) to vacate the service of process upon it, and (2) by the defendants Industrial Finance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “IFC”) and Morris Plan Corporation of America (hereinafter referred to as “MPC”) to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the, defendant Industrial Acceptance Corporation, an indispensable party.
The action is brought by the plaintiff as a stockholder of IAC against IFC and MPC for an accounting with respect to various alleged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Consolidated Stone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Philipbar v. DerbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Druckerman v. HarbordNew York Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cohen v. Industrial Finance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Pantzer v. RogersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
- Spielberger v. LittleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948