Legal Opinion
Pantzer v. Rogers
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 4, 1959No. Civ. No. 18536PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, Chief Judge.
The defendant, pursuant to Rules 12, 17 and 23(a) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., moves to dismiss the action upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted.
The facts briefly are as follows: The plaintiffs sue as a class, also as trustees of German-Ameriean Vocational League, Inc., hereinafter called German-American, and D.A.B. Recreational Resort, Inc., hereinafter called D.A.B. Both corporations were duly organized and existed by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. They seek the return of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohen v. Industrial Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Dix v. BrownellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- George C. Dix v. William Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pioneer Import Corp. v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960